Jump to content
The Official Site of the Anaheim Ducks

Retire9

Members
  • Content Count

    736
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Retire9 last won the day on July 16 2013

Retire9 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

149 Excellent

About Retire9

  • Rank
    Awesome Member
  • Birthday 05/01/1992

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Camarillo, CA
  • Interests
    Hockey

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I think Ricco is gone and they move Rakell to center until steal or someone else steps in
  2. Silf... 5.25 on the third. I mean is there no one in that office that has GMIHCBM ear. I really can see what he sees. You 4 maybe 5 assets. And non of them are franchise players. Trade them, get the space and try again. It's so frustrating
  3. Cap is going up 1mill to 80.5...
  4. Too many dmen... I honestly can't see Fowler being moved. GMBM loves him and I do thing he was going to break out before they brought RC back. Mountor should be moved though. Manson showed he can score and play great D last year, Manson, Lindholm and Fowler is a good Day core. Mountor already wants to much money. Mountor could be a good return but him, Montour and a 2nd could get you a great top line player... Toronto...
  5. I hope they don't... I could really see him throwing up 40-50 points with a coach that knows how to use him.
  6. If he wanted to trade Silf and start the re-tool he'd do so now. No one will take Silf now until he's on the last year of his deal. Which means Rakell and Lindholm are really the only great trade assets. He just signed Ricco and Silf, so unless he accepts the loss on Ricco. Who else do you have to trade? You say Rakell is a no, you have the Dman, all good assets but nothing to replace them (traded to many of them already) that leaves you Ritchie, Kase and the young guys and that doesn't get you much. The fans need to prepare for very little change in this roster over the next few years unless GMBM makes some desperate trades. Getz, Perry, Rakell, Silf, Ricco, Kesler, Kase, Ritchie and Spring where do the kids fit in there?
  7. You're 100% right but I think they'll try and do right by Miller and keep close to SoCal.
  8. Future core pieces would come from Fowler and Rakell trades. While an aging Getz and Perry, will keep the team competitive and butts in the seats I don't think they take you to the playoffs. You can trade some younger assets Fowler, Rakell and Kase gain some strong assets then try again with the younger guys now and hope they are ready to take over by the time Getz and Perry retire. The recent re-tool was killed by Carlyle and now we have to many expensive contracts that needed to be handed out in order to compete during our window. Now unfortunately you'll have to trade off the good young talent you have now in order to try again with Kes, Getz and Perry are off the books. Unless you luck out and find a way to ship out Kes, Ricco and Eaves and use that almost 16 mill to reinvest into the team. But its gonna take some hard to swallow trades, that wont happen because if they do GMBM will be basiclly saying he got it wrong which will possibly get him fired. So we are probably stuck with results every year until he gets fired and a new guy comes in and tears it all down,
  9. I could see Henrique being moved at the deadline and maybe Fowler and Rakell being moved for some big hauls in the offseason. GMBM has said there will be changes and they are running out of assets really fast. Maybe treating Kesler like a Hossa and attaching that salary with Rakell to a low cap team. That is a lot of salary, Your core of Getz, Perry, Silfverberg, Lindholm and Gibson can keep you competitive while the young guys come up and take over.
  10. I thought of it because it seems like a BM guy and a BM move lol
  11. Good point, Tampa does have some good young talent.
  12. Silver to Tampa for killorn? Pretty similar players, Tampa gets equal production and salary relief for next year. Duck get a guy with term and similar production.
  13. Thanks, that's what I was going for.
  14. Haha thank you... This gotten taken way to serious lol. You'd think I was eklund or something lol. Just meant to spark a conversation during some down time. Yes I am well aware that it won't happen... I'll just go back to my whole. Sorry I made a scary random scenario... Didn't mean to offend lol.
  15. I have a feeling you're taking this all a bit to serious... yes I know it won't happen. Just a discussion of if people would do it. I got your answer so feel free to move one. And again ONLY IF NUMBER ONE. Don't know how many times that needs to he pointed out. I am aware it's not a guarantee, why I said so many times only if it's #1 lol.
×
×
  • Create New...