Jump to content
The Official Site of the Anaheim Ducks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.

Sexlaf15

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    7,395

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

Sexlaf15 last won the day on August 1

Sexlaf15 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,377 Excellent

1 Follower

About Sexlaf15

  • Rank
    Ultimate Ducks Fan

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Sexlaf15
  2. Sexlaf15
    I really like Lundestrom’s development. He could be a really solid 3rd line center behind Z and McTavish in the future.
  3. Sexlaf15
  4. Sexlaf15
    I’m gonna dump some impressions from Felix a Ducks writer. Pastujov can really shoot it PerrAult has a nasty one timer Zellweger has some silky mitts Ducks seem committed to Steel as a Center Drysdale said he’s fine with being on his off hand side but feels more comfortable on the right Comtois-Zegras-Terry line getting some love from Eakins
  5. Sexlaf15
  6. Sexlaf15
    Just saw that too. Don’t really know what that means, maybe makes me slightly less optimistic that he’s being shopped?
  7. Sexlaf15
    I definitely don’t think Lindholmis bad, but yes this is my point. He’s not getting younger, he’s had issues staying healthy, he plays a pretty physical game. Ducks really should look to get value for him. Imagine what you nab in next draft with a mid-to-late first first round pick + maybe a prospect or more picks. Ducks draft very well imo. So they need to play to that strength.
  8. Sexlaf15
    Tweet is sarcastic I assume. Just shared to you show that there is noticeable decline in Lindholm’s game already. Now that can be for a number of reasons, but I still think it’s a good case for trading him to acquire futures for the rebuild.
  9. Sexlaf15
  10. Sexlaf15
  11. Sexlaf15
    The biggest issue isn’t physicality it’s the fact that the Ducks cannot exit their defensive zone with control. 2 straight years are weak flips that end up as turn overs and extending zone time that leads to goals.
  12. Sexlaf15
    It’s so weird for people to want to keep Lindholm because they want to keep good defensemen, then on the same breathe want to move Fowler. His contract isn’t moveable right now, but even then Fowler has been significantly better for the Ducks than Lindholm this last few seasons.
  13. Sexlaf15
    Btw Fowler has been our best defensemen for like 3 years straight, not Lindholm.
  14. Sexlaf15
    I’m definitely not saying Hambus would be useless and I would love for him to be useful and good. I just worry how 35 year old Hambus Lindholm looks on this team at 7-9 million when they’re actually trying to win. Lindholm and Rakell and MAYBE Rico at retained salary are the only desirable pieces this team has and they should absolutely be looking to get more draft capital and prospects.
  15. Sexlaf15
    No, you trade aging good players for assets to assist the rebuild. Committing 7-9 million dollars for Lindholm doesn’t make sense, he’ll be pushing 30 by the time this team is good again and will be declining. It just doesn’t make sense to commit that much money to him. If he was 3-4 years younger, I’d keep him. The Ducks also should be looking to weaponize their cap space in the next couple years and having another huge cap it for someone who isn’t an impact player again doesn’t make sense.
×
×
  • Create New...